Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Mena vs Scott Griekspoor Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mena vs Griekspoor analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Mena vs Scott Griekspoor Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mena has won 51.4% of points on his second serve, while Griekspoor has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mena, in recent form, has won 55.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Griekspoor has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.88% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mena has saved 60.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Griekspoor has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mena has won 68.35% of matches played (W/L 54/ 25), with Griekspoor winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Griekspoor has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 95/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 111/ 84).
- Player level: In the last year, Mena has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.74% of matches (W/L 33/ 10), where as Griekspoor has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mena winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Mena winning 2 and Griekspoor winning 2. The last match between Mena and Griekspoor was at the L'Aquila Challenger, 21-08-2019, Second, Clay with Facundo Mena getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:9.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mena and Griekspoor have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mena winning 0 times and Griekspoor 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mena winning 0, and Griekspoor 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mena has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.29 while Griekspoor has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mena has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Griekspoor has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mena has converted 52.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Griekspoor has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mena 1 - 1 Griekspoor
340
Rank
127
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
205
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
57% (466-354)
Career Total W/L
61% (260-169)
67% (24-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$140,110
Career Prize Money
$2,105
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mena VS Griekspoor H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Facundo Mena | Scott Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 22 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:9 | 1:31:9 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (71/125) | 63% (85/135) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (58/71) | 69% (59/85) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (31/54) | 60% (30/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (46/135) | 29% (36/125) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Mena VS Griekspoor H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Facundo Mena
Player
Scott Griekspoor
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 7-6(7) 6-3 |
Stats
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Facundo Mena
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
32 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Mena | Scott Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (24/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (51/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (407/294) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 66% (21/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 144 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 67 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:22 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 333.78 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (1147/2099) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (823/1147) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (486/952) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (138/249) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1005/2218) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (13/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (24/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (22/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (22/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Facundo Mena
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Facundo Mena
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Karue Sell
54%
(
59 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
111
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Kaichi Uchida
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Leonardo Aboian
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Facundo Mena
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
37%
(
25 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Daniel Antonio Nunez
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Fermin Tenti
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
6
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Thomas Brown
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Scott Griekspoor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Scott Griekspoor
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Scott Griekspoor
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Carlos Gomez-Herrera
58%
(
65 of
113)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
128)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
65 of
83)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
7%
(
1 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
37 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
40 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
125
|
3-6 7-6(8) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Scott Griekspoor
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Jay Clarke
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Scott Griekspoor
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Gabriele Bosio
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Scott Griekspoor
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mena Vs Griekspoor Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
